✨ Let’s get into it ✨
💡 TLDR
Ugh, finally someone said it: fashion is literally going backward. Vanessa Friedman’s New York Times piece dropped the bombshell—size inclusivity is fading fast, and the industry’s supply chains are a…
Ugh, finally someone said it: fashion is literally going backward. Vanessa Friedman’s New York Times piece dropped the bombshell—size inclusivity is fading fast, and the industry’s supply chains are about to crash into a climate wall. Let’s unpack why this is a full-blown disaster for both bodies and the planet.
First, the size inclusivity rollback. Brands are pivoting back to “small” sizes, blaming everything from conservative trends to the rise of GPL-1s (whatever those are, they’re basically the new “tiny”). But here’s the real kicker: it’s not just about trends. The cost of making clothes for all body types is just too high. Retailers are cutting corners, prioritizing profit over people. And let’s be real, the “thin is in” vibe is back, which means curves are getting left out of the equation. It’s like the industry forgot how to do inclusivity without sacrificing margins.
Then there’s the climate angle. Fashion’s supply chains are a mess, and it’s not just about fast fashion anymore. From cotton to dyeing to shipping, every step is a carbon bomb. Brands are scrambling to greenwash their way out of it, but the truth is, sustainable practices are expensive. So when companies cut corners on materials or labor, they’re basically throwing money at a fire—while the planet burns.
But here’s the thing: these issues aren’t separate. Inclusivity and sustainability are tied together. If a brand can’t afford to make clothes for all body types, they’re also probably using cheap, polluting materials. It’s a cycle. And honestly, it’s exhausting.
💫 Fashion’s supply chains are a climate disaster, and sustainable practices are just too costly for many companies.
KEY POINTS: Brands are choosing profit over inclusivity, which means curves are getting left out of the equation. Fashion’s supply chains are a climate disaster, and sustainable practices are just too costly for many companies. Inclusivity and sustainability are linked—when one suffers, the other does too.
So, what’s your take? Are you still shopping for brands that care about both your size and the planet? Drop your fave sustainable picks in the comments—no judgment, just vibes.
❓ People Also Ask
What causes fashion’s size inclusivity decline?
Fast fashion prioritizes profit over diversity, leading to narrow size ranges. Brands focus on trends over body inclusivity, reducing options for plus-size and smaller customers.
How are fashion supply chains adapting to climate change?
Brands are adopting sustainable materials, reducing waste, and improving energy efficiency. Many are setting carbon reduction targets and investing in circular fashion models.
💬 What do you think? Let us know in the comments! 👇